1. Executive Status

The implementation is READY WITH REQUIRED HARDENING for a controlled pre-release review. The actual release binary works outside the development repository on macOS Apple Silicon, and its golden path, diagnostics, output integrity, determinism, and watcher recovery have been exercised. The artifact must not be described as cross-platform or performance-budget compliant until the authoritative platform matrix and budgets are available and measured.

This is a technical release decision. It does not claim product-market validation, adoption, switching value, migration demand, or differentiation.

2. MVP Release Boundary

Implemented and supported

Implemented but experimental

Explicitly unsupported

Assets, custom routing, relative-reference resolution, project configuration, themes, plugins, RSS, sitemaps, taxonomies, deployment integrations, image processing, remote data, multilingual content, persistent caching, incremental builds, and a build graph.

Unknown

Long-running maintenance behavior, large publications, performance against the authoritative budgets, and behavior on platforms other than the tested target.

3. Release Artifact

| Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Version | v0.1.0 | | Binary | ray | | Target | aarch64-apple-darwin | | Archive | raymatic-v0.1.0-aarch64-apple-darwin.tar.gz | | SHA-256 | b544ac9c0cc7fff744ffd10150bf8ef38b9876830ee6ca8c6b75f7d58012beec | | Format | gzip-compressed tar archive containing the standalone executable | | Invocation | ray new, ray dev, ray check, ray build | | Installation location | Any directory on PATH, such as $HOME/.local/bin/ray | | Project structure | README.md, content/, presentation/page.html; output/ after build | | Distribution | GitHub draft release |

4. Supported Platform Matrix

| Platform | Artifact | End-to-end status | Claim | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | macOS Apple Silicon | Release archive | Startup, new, dev, watch, check, build, paths, diagnostics verified | Supported for controlled pre-release | | macOS Intel | None | Not tested | Unknown | | Linux x86_64 | None | CI source checks only; no release artifact or watcher run | Not claimed | | Windows x86_64 | None | CI source checks only; no release artifact or watcher run | Not claimed |

Required hardening: import the authoritative platform decision and either test the intended matrix or explicitly narrow v0.1 to macOS Apple Silicon.

5. Installation Results

The archive was extracted into a temporary directory outside the repository. From that clean-machine-like location, the standalone binary returned ray 0.1.0, created a publication in a Unicode path (publicação ü), passed check, passed build, and wrote output/index.html. No Cargo state, source-tree file, developer-specific environment variable, or repository-relative asset was used.

The documented install flow is in docs/INSTALL.md. Uninstallation is deleting one executable; upgrade is replacing it with a verified archive. No package manager integration is required for this pre-release.

6. CLI Audit

The release binary was checked for root help, version, help for each command, unknown command, and execution in generated and invalid projects.

7. Golden-Path Results

Using the release executable: create publication; inspect generated README and structure; add content; start dev; edit content; edit presentation; create a missing-title error; observe CONTENT002; restore content; run check; run build; inspect output/index.html. The flow completed successfully.

The release watcher produced revisions 1 → 2 → 2 → 3: a valid edit advanced the preview, the invalid edit retained the previous revision, and the correction recovered automatically. A second smoke run covered a new file, presentation edit, deletion, and rename with revisions 1 → 2 → 3.

8. Correctness and Output Integrity

The pipeline is shared by dev, check, and build. Invalid content, template failures, route collisions, and broken references prevent an output plan from being committed. Existing output remains intact after failed validation. Output paths are relative and reject absolute or parent-directory escapes. Route collisions are diagnosed before planning. Repeated builds use staged directories and replace the complete output only after all entries are written.

9. Determinism

Content discovery is sorted by relative path; diagnostics are sorted by source path, code, and summary; addresses and output paths are derived functions; and fixture tests compare repeated output plans and diagnostic ordering. The release clean-machine run also produced the same generated structure and output path. No known behavior depends on filesystem iteration order or watcher event order; watcher events are coalesced before a coarse rebuild.

10. Diagnostic Audit

| Case | Code | Result | | --- | --- | --- | | Malformed front matter | CONTENT001 | Source path, location where available, cause, expected syntax, and fix. | | Missing title | CONTENT002 | Source path/location, semantic cause, expected attribute, and fix. | | Rendering failure | RENDER001 | Presentation path, template explanation, expected template shape, and fix. | | Route collision | ADDR001 | Each colliding source, derived address, expected uniqueness, and fix. | | Broken absolute internal reference | REF001 | Link span, target, expected address, and fix. |

There is no project configuration format, so configuration diagnostics are not applicable. Expected user errors are not presented as raw Rust errors. Source provenance uses stable codes, error severity, owned paths, and source spans where the parser provides them.

11. Development-Loop Audit

dev performs discover → evaluate → serve → watch → coarse rebuild → report → refresh. Content, presentation, creation, deletion, rename, rapid successive saves, invalid content, and correction were exercised. A recoverable content error leaves the server and last valid preview alive. The server is started after the initial evaluation, so an invalid project structure does not mask its error with a port-binding failure.

12. Performance Measurements

Measured on macOS 15 / Apple Silicon, Rust release binary, one-page generated publication, using /usr/bin/time -p:

| Path | Measurement | Classification | | --- | --- | --- | | check | < 0.01 s at timer resolution | Budget comparison unavailable | | build | < 0.01 s at timer resolution | Budget comparison unavailable | | Cold startup | Not separately measured | Unknown | | First preview | Not separately measured | Unknown | | Edit-to-visible | Revision recovery verified; browser paint not measured | Unknown |

The exact budgets from TECHNICAL_REQUIREMENTS.md are not present in this repository. Required hardening is to import them and repeat measurements with the specified methodology and representative publication sizes. No Rust performance potential is used as evidence.

13. Cross-Platform Results

Only macOS Apple Silicon has a release artifact and end-to-end result. CI runs formatting, Clippy, tests, and build checks on Linux, macOS, and Windows, but successful compilation is not treated as platform support. No cross-platform claim is made.

14. Dependency Audit

| Dependency | Purpose | Assessment | | --- | --- | --- | | clap | Four-command CLI and help/exit behavior | Required. | | pulldown-cmark | Markdown rendering | Required. | | toml + serde | Front matter parsing | Required by content convention. | | minijinja | Presentation rendering | Required by the template model. | | notify | Filesystem watching | Required by dev. | | tiny_http | Local preview server | Required by dev. | | thiserror | Typed environment/application errors | Required for error boundaries. |

tempfile is test-only. No unused direct dependency or overlapping experiment was found. No dependency change is required for this release review.

15. Rust Complexity Audit

There are no custom traits, public generic frameworks, async runtime, feature flags, or unsafe code. Arc<str> preserves source ownership for diagnostics; Arc<Mutex<DevState>> connects the blocking server thread and watcher loop; Box<Diagnostic> carries rich parser/render errors without unnecessary copying. These complexities serve current requirements. Asset-related representation is deferred and should remain under observation, but removing it now would alter the documented semantic boundary without release evidence.

16. Test and Quality Results

Passed:

17. Security/Safety Sanity Check

Output path validation rejects absolute and parent-directory paths. Staged output prevents partial production replacement. Existing new targets are not overwritten. The preview binds to loopback only. HTML templates are project-local MiniJinja templates; no remote code or plugin execution exists. Malformed content produces diagnostics rather than panics in exercised cases. A full dependency security audit is outside this proportionate review and remains a release hardening item if the distribution becomes public.

18. Documentation Readiness

docs/INSTALL.md covers installation, quick start, generated structure, content, presentation, dev, check, build, and output location. Generated project README explains the same workflow after new. CLI help covers command discovery; diagnostics cover expected failures. The documentation does not teach internal architecture or future capabilities.

19. Scope Audit

No new capability was implemented. Release blockers and hardening items are evidence, platform, and measurement concerns. Package-manager integration, plugins, themes, migration, RSS, sitemap, image processing, and generalized extension hooks remain post-MVP capabilities.

20. Product Hypotheses Still Requiring Evidence

| Hypothesis | Existing evidence | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Operational complexity is significant | Internal design rationale only | Inference only | | Value exists beyond beginners | No participant sessions | No meaningful evidence | | Strong defaults cover a useful common case | One generated publication and fixtures | Inference only | | Explanations change user behavior | Structured diagnostics only | No meaningful evidence | | Portability affects product choice | Portable file structure only | No meaningful evidence | | Migration friction affects adoption | No migration session | No meaningful evidence | | Migration intelligence would matter | No evidence | No meaningful evidence | | The product remains substantially smaller than competitors | Four-command implementation only | Inference only |

21. Release Blockers

No correctness blocker was found for the tested target. Before final public v0.1, the following evidence blockers must be resolved:

22. Hardening Required

Import the missing authoritative documents into the repository, run the specified performance methodology, and add release artifacts only for platforms actually verified. Perform a proportionate dependency/security review before broad public distribution.

23. Known Limitations

The server uses a fixed loopback port, browser paint timing is not measured, relative references and assets are unsupported, and only macOS Apple Silicon has a verified release artifact. These limitations are documented and do not alter the MVP model.

24. Post-Release Evidence Questions

Observe whether developers can install and use the artifact without intervention, whether diagnostics change recovery behavior, whether conventions remain useful for experienced SSG users, whether portability affects choice, and whether the reduced operational surface is valuable enough to overcome switching cost. These are product hypotheses, not release claims.

25. Final Readiness Decision

READY WITH REQUIRED HARDENING

The actual MVP can proceed to controlled pre-release review because its tested artifact is standalone, its golden path works outside the repository, and its failure/recovery and output guarantees are exercised. It is not yet a final public v0.1 claim because platform support and product-derived performance budgets remain unresolved. No user-validation claim is made.